Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1630

reference
407-tree-1
name
1630
tree-preservation-order

undefined

407-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028141 50.889954)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028099 50.889950,-1.028100 50.889958,-1.028106 50.889966,-1.028116 50.889972,-1.028128 50.889976,-1.028141 50.889977,-1.028154 50.889976,-1.028166 50.889972,-1.028175 50.889966,-1.028182 50.889959,-1.028184 50.889951,-1.028182 50.889942,-1.028176 50.889935,-1.028167 50.889929,-1.028155 50.889925,-1.028142 50.889923,-1.028129 50.889924,-1.028117 50.889928,-1.028107 50.889934,-1.028101 50.889942,-1.028099 50.889950)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL